|
Key witnesses and testimony
Day One / Wednesday, May 30
1st Lt. Alexander Martin
A platoon second lieutenant in Haditha in 2005.
-
Had no reason to suspect a possible war crime when
he inspected the sites in Haditha.
-
Encountered "screaming mothers and angry fathers" a day after the
killings when he toured the neighborhood where they took place.
"The people were very standoffish and scared," he said. "The men were
staring at us."
Haditha residents were much more cooperative after the Nov. 19 incident,
Martin testified.
"After Nov. 19, people would come up to me and tell me where the IEDs
were," he said.
[Source:
North County Times,
New York Times]
Capt. James Haynie
Identified in the
press as a bomb strike coordinator and a company commander.
-
Two Iraqis complained to him two days after the
incident. One told him that members of his family had been pulled from
their homes and shot by the Marines. The other protested that the men
who emerged from the car were students on their way to the city of Ramadi.
-
Brought concerns
to Capt. Lucas McConnell, one of the officers facing dereliction of
duty charges. Haynie said McConnell later told him that the car had
AK-47 assault rifles in it and that some of the men wore "chest rigs"
carrying explosives.
Capt. Haynie also
testified that
Marines use a computer program to estimate how many civilians are
likely to be killed when a bomb is dropped from the air. If more than
30 will die, that is considered a high number of civilian deaths but,
"under no circumstances does collateral damage preclude you from
delivering ordinance."
[Sources:
Associated Press,
North County Times]
1st Lt. Max Frank
A Kilo Company
platoon commander, given immunity to testify. Lt. Frank arrived on the
scene four hours after the insurgent ambush.
-
Inspected the homes and supervised
the removal of bodies. Saw
the corpses of Iraqi women and children sprawled across a bed.
Testified that nothing struck him as alarming about how a Marine
squad had killed the civilians
-
Delivered
bodies to the facility's morgue the night of Nov. 19, 2005.
-
Was told by his superiors to tell Haditha officials that the Marines
were sorry for the civilian deaths, but it the result of allowing
terrorists to use their homes to attack Marines.
-
Testified that he took photos at the scene, but 1st Lt. Adam Mathes
deleted the electronic images because he thought they were not
allowed to have pictures of dead Iraqis on personal equipment.
Quote: "From my perspective at the time, my assumption was my
Marines were doing the right thing....I rationalized it to myself as
they were taking fire. The Marines could have come in, yelled at them
to come out, and when they didn't come out they cleared the room with
a fragmentation grenade....I
didn't have any reason to believe that what they had done was done on
purpose," Frank said, later adding that he did not believe the deaths
represented a violation of the rules of engagement or international
laws of armed conflict. "I assumed they had taken fire and they had
made a mistake."
[Sources:
Associated Press,
North County Times,
Marine Corps Times]
Sgt. Maj. Edward Sax
The 3rd Battalion's sergeant major.
Testified that
Chessani visited
Haditha the same day as the ambush, but instead of going to the houses
where the women and children died, he inspected another site where
Marines had been injured in a separate engagement. The sergeant major
advised Chessani not to go to the locations immediately
following the killings because it was too dark and dangerous in the
area.
Sgt. Maj. Sax, who
worked closely with Chessani, called his former boss "by far the
strongest moral leader I have ever served with in my life." When asked
if Chessani would have investigated the deaths if he'd suspected the
Marines had done something wrong, Sax replied: "Without batting an
eye."
Sax also testified
members of the Haditha town council gave Chessani a written allegation
that some of those slain had been rounded up and shot by Marines.
[Source:
Associated Press]
____________________________
Day Two / Thursday, May 31
Lt. Col.
Paul Atterbury
The prosecutor presentation the government's version of what happened
that day.
The
prosecutor claimed...
-
some of the 24 Iraqis killed by Marines were shot in the head,
several of them at such close range that the bodies had powder
burns.
-
the five young men killed near a car were standing still, possibly
with their hands in the air to surrender.
-
no weapons were found in the car or near the men's bodies. Nor were
any weapons found in the three homes.
[Source:
Los Angeles Times]
W. Hays
Park
Lawyer in the Department of Defense. Parks was identified as one of
the key authors of the military's rules requiring commanders to report
any "possible, alleged or suspected" crime by their troops. Parks said
that such rules were adopted after the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, in
which commanders made only cursory inquiries in the days after the
mass killing.
Called by the government, Parks spent more than six hours on the
stand, spending much of it explaining how he helped write a regulation
that requires an investigation whenever a "possible, alleged or
suspected" violation of the law of war occurs.
Parks testified that the idea behind the rules of investigation is "to
encourage the commander to continue the battle but turn over incidents
to competent investigators rather than doing it themselves."
He said that the deaths of at least five Iraqi women and children
should have raised enough suspicion from Marine commanders for them to
order an immediate investigation.
The prosecutor, Lt. Col. Paul Atterbury, described in graphic terms
how some of the victims died. He said that the women and children
found in a bedroom in one of four homes stormed by the Marines after
the bombing appeared to have died from head wounds.
Given that detail, Parks said that even a cursory examination by
commanders on the scene should have indicated that something was
wrong.
Atterbury then looked at photos of some of the civilians killed in
Haditha. He asked Parks whether the fatal shootings of men, women and
children, some of them shot in the head, would amount to an incident
that merited investigation.
“The substantial number of head shots suggests to me that you have a
nonresisting force. ... (It) raises issues,” Parks said.
After hearing several descriptions from Atterbury about what happened
in Haditha, Parks said: "The fact is, a crime appears to have been
committed. How could you not investigate that?"
He testified
repeatedly that “when in doubt,” commanders must report any potential
offense to higher headquarters.
Parks
testified that while Chessani had a obligation to report the Haditha
deaths to his superiors, he was not responsible for investigating the
incident. (Two of the three charges against Chessani involve his
alleged failure to probe what happened in Haditha.)
Quote:
"You can't use Fallouja-style room-clearing in a place like Haditha,"
Parks testified
[Sources:
Los Angeles Times,
North County Times,
San Diego Union Tribune,
Los Angeles Times]
____________________________
Day Three
/ Friday, June 1
Maj. Gen.
Richard Huck
Former
commanding general of the 2nd Marine Division based at Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina, who at the time of the incident, was in charge of
troops in Haditha. The general testified via video hookup from the
Pentagon.
The general’s testimony in the Lt. Col. Chessani hearing
changed considerably from his testimony in the
Capt. Randy Stone
hearing.
According to the Associated Press…
[Investigating Officer]
Conlin and
prosecutors asked Huck about a Haditha town council meeting Chessani
attended eight days after the killings. At that session, prosecutor
Lt. Col. Paul Atterbury said local residents gave Chessani written
allegations that women and children were targeted inside their homes
and that a group of men were "essentially executed" as they stood
beside a car with their hands in the air.
Huck said that he should
have been made aware of the document but was not, and that he learned
that the town council meeting had occurred only when he testified at a
hearing last month for another officer charged in the case.
(It should be noted that Col. R.
Gary Sokoloski, the general's aide, has
refused to testify.)
In
the courtroom, Maj. Gen. Huck testified he
relied on his lower
level commanders for full and accurate reporting of events.
One of the
first reports Huck saw indicated that Chessani had gone to the site of
the bombing, a factor he said gave him a sense that the battalion
commander was getting all the facts. According to other testimony,
Chessani did not inspect the site of the ambush.
The general
also said that a complaint by the Haditha town council on Nov. 27 that
three entire families -- including several women and children --
had been killed in one of four homes stormed by the Marines following
the bombing should have been brought to his attention. Chessani
attended a meeting in which that complaint was issued in writing along
with a request by the Iraqis for a formal investigation.
Regarding this
report from the Haditha town council, Huck testified: "If that
document was presented, this needs to be reported and that commander
should be thinking 'Perhaps I should get an investigation started."
According to
the Los Angeles Times…
Chessani's report,
filed that night, indicated that the civilians were killed by a
roadside bomb and a firefight that followed between Marines and
insurgents barricaded in the homes.
Evidence in Chessani's Article 32 preliminary hearing at Camp
Pendleton showed that no weapons or insurgent shell casings were found
in the homes and that the homes were more than 100 yards from where a
bomb had killed a Marine and wounded two.
Defense attorneys say Chessani let his superior officers know that
there had been civilian casualties, including women and children.
Prosecutors respond that the report was misleading in suggesting that
the Marines were responding to gunfire and that some of the casualties
had been caused by the roadside bomb.
According to
the North County Times…
Late
in the day of the killings, Chessani sent a report to regimental
headquarters stating that 15 civilians and eight insurgents had
died....
When asked by prosecutor Lt. Col. Paul
Atterbury whether he had ever been made aware that three entire
families were killed, including several women and children, Huck said
he did not learn about the families until after an investigation was
ordered in February 2006.
"I would have expected any new facts or
discoveries to be reported," he said.
Atterbury asked Huck whether he had ever
learned that Haditha officials alleged within days that the men in the
car were students who had been, in the prosecutor's words,
"essentially executed by the Marines."
"That should have been reported," Huck
said.
Quote:
"I think the question is did he report everything that he knew, and I
have some questions about that," Maj. Gen. Richard A. Huck, testifying
via video from the Pentagon.
[Sources:
North County Times,
Associated Press,
Los Angeles Times
Brig. Gen.
John Toolan
According to
the North County Times….
Brig. Gen. John
Toolan also testified via video hookup from Washington, saying he has
known Chessani for 18 years and considers him a man of strong values
who always gave commanders a straight answer.
Toolan, who oversees Southeast Asia issues
for Defense Secretary Robert Gates, said he doubted Chessani would sit
on bad news.
"I don't have any question that he would ever try to hide it or cover
up," Toolan said.
[Source:
North County Times]
Lt.
Col Christopher Starling
Operations
officer, 2nd Marine Regiment, at the time of the ambush. He
read Lt. Col. Chessani's daily reports.
-
Saw
no need to launch an investigation at the time because he did not
think a war crime had taken place. As the Associated Press noted,
dozens of other Marines have testified along similar lines at this and
earlier proceedings.
-
Confirmed that during the entire deployment, their area of
responsibility was constantly being assaulted by foreign terrorists.
He confirmed that these terrorists routinely used women and children
as shields to attack Marines from.
-
Said that Lt. Col. Chessani's area of operation was a little
smaller than the state of South Carolina. He testified that LtCol
Chessani and his battalion performed incredibly well during their
deployment to Iraq.
Quote:
"If there was no sign of the enemy and we killed civilians, that's
something that needs to be reported up," Starling, who is deployed at
sea, testified via telephone. "Part of our job is protecting the
civilian populace. If it's unwarranted, that's something you'd want to
look into."
[Source:
Associated Press,
Los Angeles Times]
____________________________
Day Four /
Saturday, June 2
Maj. Samuel
Carrasco
Operations
officer, 3rd Battalion.
Testified that the last terrorist they found that day went into a house and
grabbed a child in order to pretend he was a civilian family member.
The only reason the terrorist’s ruse was discovered was that blood was
coming from his ears
Recommended
that Lt. Col Chessani not visit the site of the ambush.
“I was of the
opinion that day and still believe that Lt. Col. Chessani could best
serve the battalion by staying in the (Command Operations Center),”
Carrasco said.
Quote:
[In a meeting after the incident] "We said, 'Hey, sir, this is going
to get bad very fast if we don't do something,' " Carrasco testified.
"He raised his voice, which is something he rarely did, and said, 'My
men are not murderers.' We adjourned the room."
[Source:
Los Angeles Times,
San Diego Union]
____________________________
Day Five /
Monday, June 4
1st Lt.
Adam Mathes
Kilo Co.
executive officer.
Testified that he overheard Chessani and Capt. Lucas
M. McConnell talking about how to “spin” the deaths in Haditha.
Defense attorney Robert J. Muise accused Mathes of not correctly
remembering the conversation.
Testified that he did not believe the killings constituted a violation of
the laws of armed conflict.
[Source:
North County Times]
Lt. William
Kallop
Platoon CO,
the only officer on the scene during most of the incident. The
lieutenant (granted immunity) testified just prior to the 3/1's third
deployment to Iraq.
Testified,
as in the Capt. Randy Stone hearing, that he did not believe the
slayings represented a violation of the laws of armed conflict.
[Source:
North County Times]
____________________________
Day
Six / Tuesday, June 5
First Lt. Mark E. Towers
A battalion legal adviser in Iraq in 2005.
Testified to Lt. Col. Chessani's character as "a godly man".
Colonel Conlin asked Lieutenant Towers, who was , if a report by Colonel Chessani’s staff to
the regiment stating that the colonel had examined the scene of the
civilian casualties “implied that he went there.”
Lieutenant
Towers answered firmly, “Yes, sir.”
[Source:
New York
Times,
Los Angeles Times]
Capt. Oliver B. Dreger
Testified that one of the explanations for the deaths in Haditha – that 15
of the Iraqis were killed by a roadside bomb – as “ridiculous on its
face.” Also testified that neither he nor other officers felt obliged to
correct the accounts about what happened that day in Haditha. That's
because the civilians' deaths were linked to combat between Marines and
insurgents, he testified.
The errant
information was apparently sent to higher military headquarters.
[Source:
San Diego Union Tribune,
Los Angeles Times]
Maj. Carroll Connelley
One of the 1st Marine Regiment's command staff attorneys at the time of
the incident.
Frustrated by the dearth of details from
lower-ranking Marines. After the incident, Connelley said he sought elaboration after an
initial report was light on specifics. No commanders sought a probe
into the deaths of two dozen Iraqi civilians in Haditha in the days
and weeks after the incident, he said.
“I would've
asked for an investigation” if reports had documented how no weapons
or insurgents were found among the dead civilians, Connelley
testified.
He said that
in light of the misinformation, especially the premise that civilians
got caught up in bona-fide combat, Chessani was not required to
investigate the incident further.
"My
understanding, at least at the time, was that they were out in the
open," Connelly said of the first report, which said 15 civilians had
been killed as a result of the bombing and small-arms fire. "(The
report) says they were out moving past the vehicles."
If the
initial report had in any way indicated that the civilians were killed
inside their homes where no insurgents nor weapons were found,
Connelly said he would have raised questions.
He also
testified that a formal demand for an investigation from the Haditha
town council eight days after the killings was never brought to his
attention. He said he also did not know until much later that the dead
included several women and children found lying in supplicant
positions inside a bedroom.
"It was
something different than what I had always pictured," Connelly said.
[Sources:
San Diego Union Tribune,
North County Times]
____________________________
Day
Seven / Wednesday, June 6
Capt. Jeffrey Dinsmore
Intelligence officer,
3rd Battalion. Testified that Marine officers decided the
deaths were combat-related and thus no investigation was warranted.
According to the Los Angeles Times, in a sometimes bitter
exchange with prosecutors, he denounced the Marine Corps for charging
Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani with dereliction of duty.
"Politically, the Marine Corps made a decision to hang Col. Chessani
out to dry," said Dinsmore, who has served for 20 years and is now
deployed to Iraq. He added that he feels the investigation is hurting
the corps.
Dinsmore, in testimony that was videotaped earlier this year, said
Marines had developed intelligence prompting them to prepare for a
complex attack involving roadside bombs and small-arms fire, with
insurgents hiding among civilians in their homes.
The events seemed to fit that pattern, he said: A bomb exploding under
a Humvee and a nearby firefight that erupted after Marines stormed
three houses and killed 19 civilians inside.
With an increasing tone of incredulity, Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan, the
lead prosecutor in the Article 32 inquiry for Chessani, repeatedly
asked Dinsmore whether he had requested a report on the deaths of 24
civilians in the Haditha incident.
"No, sir," Dinsmore answered.
According to the Associated Press, Chessani's defense team called
Dinsmore as a witness to describe what was happening around Haditha in
the months leading up to the killings. He said insurgents regularly
used hospitals and mosques to launch attacks. Men pretending to be
asleep in a house shot and killed a Marine when he entered.
"They would exploit any hesitation in order to gain an advantage,"
Dinsmore said.
After he learned of the roadside bomb blast, Dinsmore said he sent
an unmanned aerial surveillance vehicle into the skies above Haditha,
where it circled for much of the rest of the day.
The bomb that killed Terrazas was only the first of a citywide
series of attacks that left several other Marines injured and
insurgents dead, Dinsmore said. He recalled Nov. 19 as being the
busiest day of combat in the battalion's tour.
Grainy, black-and-white images captured by the aerial drone were
briefly displayed in the courtroom. The photographs showed views of
Haditha and what Dinsmore described as insurgents meeting in a palm
grove and a house in which they subsequently hid.
Marines went on to raid that house, but several were injured when
insurgents threw grenades at them. The Marines then ordered a missile
strike that destroyed the house and killed its occupants.
Dinsmore said the feeling among the Marine battalion at the end of
the day was that they did well. The commanding general in charge of
Marines in Haditha at the time, Maj. Gen. Richard A. Huck, was briefed
about the day's combat actions three days later, including details
about women and children dying in their homes.
Huck was "congratulatory" about the battalion's actions, Dinsmore
testified.
Dinsmore and other Marines initially said eight of the 24 Iraqis
killed were insurgents, a claim that was repeated up and down the
chain of command and in a press release the day after the attack. But
under cross examination from Sullivan, Dinsmore conceded he had no
solid evidence to support the claim and said it was possible that all
24 of the Iraqi dead were innocent civilians.
[Source:
Los Angeles Times,
Associated Press]
___________________________
Day Eight
/ Thursday, June 7
Staff Sgt. Justin Laughner
Granted immunity to testify.
Testified that 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson "pressured" him to erase
photographs of the dead in Haditha from his computer. The reason was
that they would not be part of a statement being prepared for
top-ranking officers and a Time magazine reporter. Laughner said he
felt the order amounted to obstruction of justice but that he complied
and later lied when asked whether any pictures had been taken.
Laughner said he
didn't know if Lt. Col. Chessani ever saw the photographs.
The sergeant testified that he arrived several hours after the
roadside bomb. He said Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, who led the troops
involved in the shootings, told him the men in the car had "engaged"
the Marines with weapons, which Marines encountered an insurgent
firing at them in one house and that weapons were found in the houses.
Laughner testified that when he went to the houses to look for
evidence of insurgents, he instead found a wounded girl screaming
hysterically. Through an interpreter, "she said the Marines came into
her house and killed her family," Laughner said.
Lt. Grayson's attorney said he did not attend Thursday's hearing
and could not comment on Laughner's testimony.
[Sources:
San Diego Union Tribune,
Associated
Press]
Major Dana Hyatt, the Civil Affairs officer for the battalion,
also testified that he knew that women and children had been killed on
November 19th, but that this was an unfortunate by-product of war.
Major Hyatt testified that he spoke with some of the Marines
involved in the clearing of houses from which the terrorists attacked.
Major Hyatt stated that one Marine said he heard AK-47s racking.
Maj. Hyatt's testimony was not covered in the media.
____________________________
Day Nine /
Friday, June 8
Major Thomas F. Osterhoudt, the 2nd Marine Division
Comptroller, testified to his role in paying compensation to the
civilians that were killed.
Maj. Osterhoudt's testimony was not
covered in the media.
____________________________
Day Ten /
Saturday, June 9
Lt. Col. Chessani The accused gave unsworn
testimony in his defense.
According to the
Los Angeles Times:
Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani told the investigating officer at his
preliminary hearing Saturday that he did not believe he had done
anything criminally wrong in the aftermath of a Marine shooting in the
town of Haditha that left 24 Iraqi civilians dead.
"I would say to you, I do not believe my decisions and actions were
criminal, sir," Chessani told Col. Christopher Conlin.
Chessani, 43, faces a possible court-martial for not calling for a
war-crimes investigation after Marines in his battalion killed 24
Iraqis on Nov. 19, 2005....
In a six-minute statement, Chessani said that even if he were to be
court-martialed, his feelings for the Marine Corps would not be
affected. "I still respect the Marine Corps and I have no hard
feelings and I won't, regardless of how this comes out," Chessani said
in a clear, almost emotionless voice.
Chessani addressed a key issue of the court hearing: why he didn't
visit the three houses where his Marines killed 19 of the civilians,
including three women and seven children. Conlin, a former infantry
battalion commander, has quizzed several witnesses on the matter.
Chessani said that the day of the shootings was one of "nonstop
action," with roadside bombings and firefights throughout Haditha and
nearby communities.
He said that when he left his command center, he visited the site of
the most significant battle of the day, a firefight in which up to 11
Marines were injured. It ended only when he called in an airstrike to
demolish a building where insurgents were hiding, Chessani said.
Testimony by other witnesses indicated that Chessani never visited the
three houses where the civilians were killed. The lieutenant who gave
the order to "clear" the houses testified that Marines thought
insurgent gunfire had come from the direction of the homes.
In his statement, Chessani did not say why he hadn't questioned his
Marines about the killings.
Nor did he mention why he allowed a report to be filed that day with
his superiors indicating erroneously that he had visited the site of
the civilian killings.
Chessani, a Marine for 19 years, is the highest-ranking Marine officer
to face charges from Iraq or Afghanistan. He was on his third tour in
Iraq.
Several character witnesses praised Chessani for coolness under fire
and truthfulness.
"He's a Christian, an upright man," Col. Brennan Byrne testified
Saturday in a telephone call from Saudi Arabia. "As a Marine officer,
he has shown impeccable integrity. I would trust him with my life."
Quote: "I understand that I am accountable for my
decisions and actions, but I do not believe that my actions
and my decisions were criminal."
Day
Eleven / Saturday, June 11
And in closing...
From
Reuters:
U.S. commanders' belief in their Marines blinded them to the
reality of events that led to the deaths of 24 Iraqi civilians
in Haditha in November 2005, military prosecutors said on
Monday.
"This is a classic case of things gone wrong. You want to
believe in your Marine, but sometimes things go wrong," Lt.
Col. Sean Sullivan, the lead prosecutor, told a military
hearing. "There was was an absolute failure of the obligation
to investigate the death of these civilians."
Prosecutors made the argument at the end of a 2-week-long
evidentiary hearing against Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, one of
four officers and three enlisted men charged in the killings
that sparked international anger.
Chessani, 43, is charged with two counts of dereliction of
duty and a count of making a false report. Prosecutors argued
that battalion commander Chessani should have immediately
investigated the killings.
"There was a mind-set that was established at the Kilo Company
base that this is partly the Iraqis' fault," Sullivan told the
military proceedings. "No one said, 'Let's ask the hard
questions, let's find the answers, let's quietly take a look
at what happened out there and learn the hard lessons.'"....
Chessani passed on a letter from the Haditha town
council asking for a probe of the killings but did not
begin an investigation.
Defense attorney Brian Rooney argued the charges
amounted to second-guessing Chessani -- and making a
past decision criminal.
"It's entirely possible that the Marines who did the
shooting will be cleared for their part, but Colonel
Chessani will not only lose his career but could spend
time in the brig for having faith in his men," Rooney
told reporters.
From the
North County Times:
"This case does not warrant criminal charges," said Robert
Muise, a civilian attorney representing Lt. Col. Jeffrey
Chessani, in court. "The actions he took were in good faith."
Chessani is charged with dereliction of duty for what military
prosecutors maintain was his failure to fully investigate the
deaths, which followed a deadly roadside bomb explosion on a
chaotic day of battle on Nov. 19, 2005.
Chessani was commander of Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st
Marine Regiment at the time. His attorneys contend Chessani
reported everything he knew about the incident immediately
after it happened.
Aside from Chessani, three other officers face dereliction
charges for not ordering a probe of the deaths. Three enlisted
men from the battalion face murder charges.
Military prosecutor Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan argued that a
deeper probe of the deaths -- which included the killings of
two women and five children in homes near the bomb site --
should have been an obvious step.
"I think it was a conscious, willful decision not to
investigate," Sullivan said. "That event screamed out for
investigation."...
Prosecutors have argued that Chessani's faith in the Marines
under his command led him to reject the idea that the
fatalities were anything but casualties of war.
"You want to believe in your Marines," Sullivan said, "but
that doesn't negate your duty to investigate."
Sullivan also pointed to a letter that the mayor and members
of Haditha's city council supplied in English to Chessani in
the days after the shootings, asking for an investigation.
"The one man that should have been asking the hard questions
was the battalion commander," Sullivan said.
Muise, Chessani's attorney, said the letter from Haditha
leaders was a propaganda tool, and that some of them had ties
to the insurgency.
He also argued that many high ranking military officers saw
the dead as collateral damage in an attempt to ferret out
insurgents who may have been hiding in the homes, and that the
incident raised no red flags for Chessani's superior officers.
None of them called for an investigation either, Muise said.
|