|
|
|||||
|
—Caleb Carr, The Lessons of Terror, New York: Random House, 2002. Go to "An Autumn of War" |
|||||
|
|
Carr writes: "Frederick [the Great] devised the most powerful statement and proof yet that wars were best fought for realistic political goals by soldiers whose restrained behavior would limit the impact of conflict on civilians and thereby maintain or even win those citizens' loyalty." |
||||
|
Caleb Carr is a popular novelist and less popular historian. That's a shame because The Lessons of Terror is a provocative book that should be widely read and discussed. First, Carr writes, we must understand terrorists as soldiers whose actions must be met with a military response. What is terrorism? It is "warfare deliberately waged against civilians with the purpose of destroying their will to support either leaders or policies that the agents of such violence find objectionable." Secondly, we must understand that terrorism is a form of warfare that has never succeeded. This is both a hope and a warning. Carr writes:
The hope may be clearer than the warning: if America resorts to terror tactics we will ultimately defeat ourselves. Winning the war and losing the peace will only mean more conflict and misery to come. Thirdly, therefore, we must wage war as we never have in our history. America has led the world in many things, Carr argues, but not in progressive warfare. We've waged unlimited, total war many times (which Carr believes actually prolongs a war and may "lose the peace" that follows). We've shaped defensive policies (such as the Weinberger doctrine) but Carr calls for a new offensive policy. Such a policy of progressive war will require a great deal of courage and imagination. And such a policy Donald Rumsfield seems to be pursuing in the early stages of the war in Afghanistan. Caleb Carr concludes:
|
|||||